Safe Because It Is Weak: A Surgeon on the Radiofrequency Wand in Your Bathroom

Black and white photograph of a hand resting a small unbranded handheld skin device on a dark stone bathroom counter, hard side light, no face in frame. Illustrative image, not a patient. Commentary by Frank Agullo, MD, FACS.

I get asked about these wands constantly. The conversation, in order.

Are home radiofrequency devices safe?

“When a patient asks me about home radiofrequency devices, I tell them that they are safe. The main reason being that these devices do not deliver the same energy as medical grade office devices, and do not heat the dermis up to the 40 to 45 degrees Celsius range, which is what actually remodels collagen. This is also the reason why the results are very mild.”

Could it cause fat loss over years of use?

“The fat loss question is a fair one to raise, especially over a long period of time. I tell everyone that the home device may keep the skin looking a little firmer, but it does not replace an office treatment series or a lift.”

What does radiofrequency do at temperature?

“RF, or radiofrequency, uses energy to heat and coagulate the tissues, which contracts the subcutaneous tissue and the skin right away. But it also stimulates your fibroblasts to produce new collagen and elastin over the following weeks and months, so you get an immediate tightening plus a gradual, longer-term improvement.”

Is the wand the same technology as Morpheus8 or Renuvion?

“Well, the mistake here is that RF is the energy used by Morpheus8, BodyTite, AccuTite, FaceTite, and Renuvion. The only difference is that Renuvion, or J-Plasma, also has the helium plasma component. Otherwise, all these technologies are using radiofrequency effectively, and I like all of those modalities. Each is used in different areas.”

“I prefer BodyTite on thinner skin, which is usually in the arms and thighs. I prefer Renuvion J-Plasma in larger areas like the abdomen, the back, the lateral chest wall, and the flanks. I prefer FaceTite in the lower face and neck. And AccuTite around the eyes and nasolabial lines.”

Same word, different hands. More on Renuvion J-Plasma here.

What is the honest ceiling, even in the office?

“Radiofrequency is going to give us mild to moderate improvement in skin laxity. It is important to note that every patient is going to react differently to the radiofrequency energy, and the amount of skin contracture can really not be predicted, but will tell itself over the following three months.”

“With some of the radiofrequency technologies, we can repeat the treatments for further tightening. And the results that you obtain really are permanent. We create contracture, and we keep going in that timeline from that result. So obviously, as time passes, the skin can begin to lax again, but the actual contracture obtained sets the clock back.”

When is a lift the answer?

“The big difference from a surgical lift is that a lift actually cuts out excess skin and repositions the tissues, so it corrects more significant sagging. RF doesn’t remove any skin, it tightens what you have, so it’s best for mild to moderate laxity or for patients who aren’t ready for surgery.”

“Radiofrequency energy is going to work well for mild to moderate cases where the skin is still good quality. By good quality, I mean that the skin has good elasticity and is usually absent of stretch marks. In more severe cases, or when the skin quality cannot give us predictable contracture, then surgical excision is indicated.”

No device removes skin. That is a lift.

And after weight loss?

“In the area of GLP-1s, which are Ozempic, tirzepatide, and Retatrutide, small amounts of weight loss cause some skin looseness because of the loss in volume. A lot of times, the tightening effect is done by adding volume, but it can be improved in the early stages with radiofrequency, whether it’s Morpheus8 or something more invasive.”

“Massive weight loss patients will rarely respond to radiofrequency by itself, and although it can still be used, excisional surgery is necessary.”

What about the reviews on the product page?

“I think the biggest misconception is that on social media, practitioners only show their best results. This gives patients a certain expectation which may not actually happen to them.”

Keep the wand. Know what it is. The device table is on swplasticsurgery.com; the surgical side is on agulloplasticsurgery.com.

Call (915) 590-7900, text 1-866-814-0038, or book at agulloplasticsurgery.com. #StayBeautiful

Find me at @RealDrWorldWide on Instagram, TikTok, and Snapchat, @Agullo on X, or @AgulloPlasticSurgery on Facebook.

The Face That Lost the Weight: What I Told the Daily Mail About Adriana Lima

Side-by-side of Adriana Lima labeled BEFORE (left, fuller midface, 2023) and NOW (right, Madrid Fashion Week 2026, defined cheekbones and jawline). Press photos supplied by Dr. Agullo for commentary; not a patient and not a result. Commentary by Frank Agullo, MD, FACS.

“I think everybody is in agreement that Adriana Lima looks a lot more like she did in her Victoria’s Secret years. We see the high, defined cheekbones, the visible hollow below them, a sharp jawline, and natural lips, not overdone.”

That was my first line to the Daily Mail when Raven Saunt asked me to read Adriana Lima’s Madrid Fashion Week photos. It ran the same evening. Here is everything I sent her, not just the lines that fit.

I have never treated her. Photo read, not a diagnosis.

Then and now

“Around 2023 and 2024, her midface was much fuller and rounder, but she still looked youthful. Her cheeks sat lower and wider, and her lower face was much heavier, but there was no visible jowling.”

Heavy, no jowls. That is weight, not age.

“So really the difference is not that any volume was added, but rather that it has been taken off, and her structures are now showing better.”

Not surgery

“I don’t think this is surgical. It is quite clear that she’s had surgery in the past, but not in this recent transition. A facelift will change the position of the tissues, and what we’re seeing on her is a change in the volume or amount of tissue.”

Position versus volume. A deep plane facelift moves tissue. Weight loss shrinks it.

“What could explain it from a surgical perspective? I think the main difference here is her weight. She’s been pretty open about gaining weight after her pregnancies, and as surgeons we know that 10 or 15 pounds makes a huge difference in the face, whether you gain it or lose it.”

Ten or fifteen pounds. I wrote about the other direction, the face that empties too fast, in face after weight loss. Lima is the face that filled and came back.

The filler

“It may also have been that she used filler back then, in a period when it was common for filler to be overdone, and it may have been dissolved.”

Filler is a tax. The low, wide cheek of 2023 is what it looks like paid a few years too many. Dissolving it is one injection.

What she may have done instead

“GLP-1s cannot be ruled out in this era. Combined with diet and exercise, and high protein intake, these results are achievable.”

“I do think she may have used radiofrequency for skin tightening in this transition. She doesn’t have the temporal wasting we usually see in weight loss, so she may have had some biostimulators or fillers added to the temples. Botox to the masseters can help create that hollow appearance below the cheekbones. If anything a buccal fat pad removal can accentuate it even further.”

Nothing on that list is a facelift.

What people assume What the photos support The tell
Facelift No Volume changed, position did not
Buccal fat removal Possible, not required The hollow appears with weight loss alone
Filler dissolved Plausible The 2023 cheek sat low and wide
Radiofrequency tightening Plausible Skin kept up with the volume loss
Temple biostimulator or filler Plausible No temporal wasting
Masseter Botox Possible Sharper hollow below the cheekbone

The line they printed

“In conclusion, from the photos, it just doesn’t look like a face that has had surgery, but a face that has lost the excessive volume and allowed the deeper structures to show through.”

The structures were always there.

Why they ask me

Mayo Clinic fellowship. Clinical Associate Professor of Plastic Surgery at Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center. Deep plane facelifts every week in El Paso. Castle Connolly Top Doctor thirteen years running.

Ready to talk?

Bring the photos. Same read I gave the Daily Mail, including the option of dissolving what is there and doing nothing else. Call (915) 590-7900, text 1-866-814-0038, or book at agulloplasticsurgery.com. #StayBeautiful

Find me at @RealDrWorldWide on Instagram, TikTok, and Snapchat, @Agullo on X, or @AgulloPlasticSurgery on Facebook.

Companion reads: the surgery-or-not test on Agullo Plastic Surgery, the dissolve-and-tighten side on Southwest Plastic Surgery.