Posted on

They Counted Everything Except the One Thing Everybody Gets

Black and white torn-paper collage of two cut-out portraits with engraved magnolia beside a large numeral reading 50 percent.

My specialty publishes procedure counts every year. This year there is no count for neuromodulators and no count for fillers, which together are most of what gets done to faces in this country.

The reason given: the “dynamic nature of the minimally invasive treatment market.” They ranked by share instead. Neuromodulators about half. HA fillers 30 percent.

What I said about it

“I am surprised that they weren’t able to give us exact numbers from the numbers reported by surgeons, but still had a percentage.”

“Again, I’m surprised that we couldn’t get an exact count of the amount of fillers when we could still get an exact count of the amount of botulinum toxin and many other procedures.”

“I think the truth is that fillers have decreased considerably compared to other procedures, botulinum toxin still being number one. In my practice, I’ve seen more than a twenty to thirty percent decrease in the use of fillers, and a shift toward biostimulators and donor fat grafts instead.”

Who gets nervous when filler declines

“There has been such a decrease in the use of fillers that manufacturers and even med spas have become worried, as this is really the only thing they provide, since they do not have a way to provide surgical procedures, which are becoming far more common than hyaluronic acid fillers.”

If injectables are the only thing you sell, injectables are the only thing you can recommend. Read that as a comment on menus, not on people.

Botulinum toxin is the exception

“Yes, botulinum toxin is half of all minimally invasive treatments. I think it’s probably more than half in reality in our practice. This doesn’t mean that it’s the safest bet; it means that it’s something that’s tried and proven. It really is a maintenance therapy.”

“I myself get botulinum toxin in the forehead, crow’s feet, and glabella lines every three to four months, just to maintain the wrinkle free appearance with a dose that still lets me express my face without looking abnormal.”

“Patients really like the results, and that’s why they keep coming back to get the botulinum toxin injections.”

The part that actually bothers me

A market nobody can count is a market nobody can regulate. And these estimates only ever covered board-certified plastic surgeons, so everything injected outside that group was never in the table to begin with.

Fillers are also losing ground to fat, which is its own story.

More on how we approach this at Southwest Plastic Surgery in El Paso.

Call (915) 590-7900 or text 1-866-814-0038.

#StayBeautiful

Source: ASPS 2025 Procedural Statistics Report, minimally invasive section. Commentary from Dr. Agullo’s 2026-09-07 dictation.

Posted on

Half of It Might Not Survive, and It Is Still the Better Option

Black and white torn-paper collage of two cut-out portraits with engraved magnolia beside a large numeral reading 39 percent.

Facial fat grafting grew 39 percent last year, the largest jump of anything in my specialty’s annual report. It made no top five list, because those rank by volume.

What is wrong with filler

“I think we have seen that facial fillers have been quite overdone, and patients are really getting away from looking overfilled and want to look more natural. We have seen that these hyaluronic acid fillers may not dissolve completely, and they do tend to migrate. It seems like they create some kind of inflammatory response in some patients, creating nodules or inflammation.”

“And of course, the feel of a filler is not quite like natural fat, which is squishy and soft, something whose borders you wouldn’t be able to identify the way you can with a filler.”

“When patients use fillers, they see that they have to have this redone anywhere from every six months to one year. And what we’re also seeing is that not all of that filler goes away, but it’s migrating and flattening out, so it’s not giving us the volume exactly where we want it.”

The part where I argue against myself

“The main factor that disappoints people with fat injections is that the amount of retention is really unpredictable. Even though we know the patient is going to keep fifty to eighty percent of the volume, that percentage is quite unpredictable, so we are always overfilling. Patients that lose fifty percent of the volume we inject are sometimes disappointed, and we have to go back and inject more fat.”

Fifty to eighty is a wide range to hand somebody.

“The good thing is that whatever does stay is going to be quite permanent, and of course maintaining your weight is going to help with that. We know that with aging, fat will decrease in the face regardless, so it is a procedure that we probably have to repeat in the future.”

The pricing nobody mentions

“We have been using the patient’s own fat, because we have the benefit of using however much volume we really need, as the number of fat CCs does not increase the cost of the procedure, and the patient’s own fat is free.”

Filler is sold by the syringe, every year, forever.

If you want it without the harvest

“For some patients that don’t want as much downtime, we’ve been using Lipoderma, which is a donor fat graft that gives us very similar results to the patient’s own fat grafting.”

alloClae does the same job. On the biostimulator route:

“We have been using Sculptra, but this does create inflammation like scarring and fibrosis.”

It was never only Ozempic

“I think fat grafting has been rising for many years. It’s an essential component of almost all facial procedures. I incorporate fat grafting into lower eyelid surgery, I incorporate it into all my facelifts, and I incorporate it in any facial procedure where the patient has lost a considerable amount of weight.”

“So the GLP-1 wave has certainly increased the demand, but just normal aging is comprised of loss of fat and volume in the face, as well as skin laxity and quality. So just with normal aging there was already a high demand for fat transferred to the face, and now with GLP-1s that demand has increased even further.”

The report says it too: the rise extended beyond GLP-1 patients and was underway before them.

Consultations at Southwest Plastic Surgery in El Paso.

Call (915) 590-7900 or text 1-866-814-0038.

#StayBeautiful

Source: ASPS 2025 Procedural Statistics Report. Commentary from Dr. Agullo’s 2026-09-07 dictation.

Posted on

Hands Don’t Lie: Inside the Filler Trend Everyone’s Suddenly Asking About

Black and white editorial close-up of a hand resting on a sterile drape beside a fine cannula. Hand filler safety commentary by Frank Agullo, MD, FACS.

Not too long ago, a reporter from the Daily Mail called asking about hand filler. Hand filler, not face filler. Of all things.

That didn’t surprise me. I’ve been getting the question in consult rooms for over a year now, usually as an afterthought right at the end of a facelift consultation. “Also, can you do anything about my hands?” Almost always said a little sheepishly, like it’s a strange thing to ask a plastic surgeon.

They aren’t. Hands are the most honest part of the body there is. A facelift can buy your face a decade back in the mirror. Your hands don’t get that same deal. They still tell the truth.

Why Hands Age Faster Than Most People Expect

Under the thin skin on the back of the hand sits a layer of fat that cushions the tendons and veins. That fat pad thins with age, the same process that hollows out the face, except faster, because your hands take more sun, more friction, and more daily wear than your cheeks ever do.

Once that padding thins, the tendons and veins that were always there start to show. Add years of unprotected sun exposure and you get sunspots and uneven pigment layered on top. None of this is disease. It’s just wear, in the one spot nobody remembers to put sunscreen on.

The Daily Mail piece I was quoted in framed the current spike in demand around video calls and phones, and I think that’s exactly right. A decade ago, almost nobody spent hours a day staring at their own hands on a screen. Now it’s a Zoom call, a phone held up in front of your face, a ring light for the selfie: your hands are on camera constantly, the same way “Zoom face” made people suddenly notice their neck. Hands got their own version of that.

Three Ways I Actually Treat a Hand

There are three separate problems in an aging hand, and you can’t treat them all the same way. Each one needs its own approach.

Problem What I use Why
Lost volume, visible tendons and veins Hyaluronic acid filler, calcium-based biostimulators, or Lipoderma fat grafting HA is temporary and reversible; biostimulators build the patient’s own collagen; Lipoderma or a patient’s own fat grafting lasts the longest
Thin, crepey skin texture Laser resurfacing, IPL, microneedling with PDGF Rebuilds texture and quality, not just volume
Sunspots and uneven pigment IPL and laser, paired with daily sunscreen Treats existing damage; sunscreen is the only thing that prevents the next round

Most patients need some mix of the three, and I say so upfront instead of just selling whichever one happens to be in my hand that day. A hand with good fat padding but bad sun damage doesn’t need filler. A hand with thinning padding and clean skin doesn’t need a laser. Matching the treatment to the actual problem is most of the job.

Why I Won’t Touch a Hand Without a Cannula and an Ultrasound Probe

Here’s the part that matters most, and the part I told the Daily Mail directly: hands are safe to treat in experienced hands, but anatomy is everything and unforgiving.

The skin is thin. The tendons sit right under it. The veins run closer to the surface than almost anywhere else I inject. There’s no fat padding, no muscle bulk to hide a mistake the way there sometimes is on a face. Poor technique shows immediately, and it shows on a body part your patient looks at fifty times a day.

That’s why I inject hand filler with a cannula, a blunt-tipped instrument, instead of a sharp needle. A cannula is far less likely to puncture a vessel as it moves through the tissue. I also treat ultrasound guidance as a genuinely vital safety tool here, not an optional upgrade. It lets me see the vessels I’m working around in real time instead of relying on landmarks alone.

The common side effects are ordinary and expected: swelling, bruising, and a few days of stiffness that makes gripping things uncomfortable. Lumps or small nodules can form if the filler isn’t massaged correctly right after injection, which is a technique issue, not a product issue. The rare but serious risk is injecting into or compressing a blood vessel and cutting off circulation. That’s the one cannula technique and ultrasound guidance exist to prevent, and it’s why I don’t consider this an entry-level injectable.

Who I Turn Away

Not everyone who asks for hand filler is a candidate, and I say so before I ever pick up a syringe.

I won’t inject over an active skin infection, and I’m cautious with patients who have uncontrolled autoimmune or connective-tissue disease, a history of severe filler reactions, or blood thinners that can’t safely be paused for the appointment.

There’s a subtler category too. Some patients are bothered by prominent joints or visible bones on the back of the hand, not lost volume between them. Filler doesn’t fix that. It sits in the soft tissue; it doesn’t camouflage a joint. I turn those cases away rather than inject anyway, because a patient who leaves disappointed is a worse outcome for both of us than a patient I was honest with in the consult room. Taking the case isn’t the win. The right outcome is.

Why This Sits in a Surgical Practice, Not a Med Spa Menu

I did my plastic surgery fellowship at Mayo Clinic, and I’m a Clinical Associate Professor of Plastic Surgery at Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, where hand and upper extremity anatomy is part of the curriculum. Castle Connolly has named me a Top Doctor for thirteen straight years running.

None of that is a hand-filler credential specifically. It’s the reason I think about vascular anatomy the way I do before I ever pick up a cannula, on a hand or a face. The same caution that keeps a facelift safe belongs in a fifteen-minute hand appointment.

There’s no gown, no operating room, and realistically no downtime built into the schedule. I check the skin under good light, feel for how much padding is left over the tendons, and ask about decades of sun: driving with a hand on the wheel, gardening without gloves, none of it dramatic, all of it cumulative. If filler or a biostimulator is the answer, the injection itself runs fifteen to twenty minutes across both hands under topical numbing. Ice, then back to normal life the same day. I’d rather spend the extra ten minutes on the exam than the extra syringe on the wrong problem.

If your hands turn out fine and the concern is really your face, that’s a different conversation, and it usually starts with Botox or a look at the broader Med Spa and Laser menu.

Ready to Talk?

If your hands have been bothering you longer than your face has, say so. It’s a five-minute exam and an honest answer about which of the three problems you actually have.

Call (915) 590-7900, text 1-866-814-0038, or book online at agulloplasticsurgery.com/appointments. #StayBeautiful.

@RealDrWorldWide on Instagram, TikTok, and Snapchat, @Agullo on X, or @AgulloPlasticSurgery on Facebook.

  • Patient-facing version on agulloplasticsurgery.com: “The Hand Filler Question: What I Tell Patients Before I Touch a Cannula” (link once live)
  • Practice version on swplasticsurgery.com: “Hand Rejuvenation, Explained: How We Approach the Newest Anti-Aging Trend” (link once live)
  • Source: Daily Mail, “‘Hand filler’ is the latest anti-aging trend sweeping America… but experts are urging caution,” Jane Herz, July 23, 2026.
Posted on

The Field Is Diverging From Thread Lifts: A Surgeon’s Read on Nonsurgical Lifting in 2026

Black and white editorial portrait of a woman in profile in soft side light, jaw and cheek defined. Nonsurgical lifting commentary by Dr. Frank Agullo, MD, FACS.

There is a growing demand for lifting and contouring of the face without surgery. This actually also extends to the breast, body, even the buttocks. I think the growing demand has accelerated due to GLP-1 treatments, where patients undergo rapid weight loss and the appearance of aging shows up much more accelerated. There is also a tendency for maintenance early on, in order to avoid bigger procedures later.

I want to lay out where I think these technologies actually earn their place, and where the field is quietly moving on.

Start With What Aging Actually Is

As we know, aging is a combination of two things: skin laxity and volume loss. In weight loss patients, the skin has already been stretched out. The volume loss shows up as aging. Added to that, the skin that had previously been stretched out is now sagging, so the aging shows up much, much faster than in regular patients.

That is why the GLP-1 patient is changing how this conversation goes. The clock runs faster on them, and the early-maintenance mindset has become the norm rather than the exception.

The Volume Tools, Old and New

We’ve been using fillers underneath the eyes and the temples for quite a long time. The newer volume replacement materials include Sculptra, which is a biostimulator. After it is injected, the body tries to absorb the material and thus produces collagen.

The more exciting category is biostimulating and regenerative. PRP, protein-rich plasma, and PDGF, the platelet-derived growth factor. PDGF has not been cleared for injection, although some practitioners are using it off-label, but it is a great adjunct to any procedure that performs microneedling or resurfacing. It regenerates the tissues quicker, and with the growth factor we get a younger appearance and more protection of collagen.

Lipoderma is one of the newest available fillers. It is a donor-derived fat graft, which has a framework that allows the ingrowth of your own fat cells. This is a more permanent solution, more natural and more like the actual fat that we have in our face, rather than scar tissue or collagen. Tiger Aesthetics is going to come out next year with a similar product called Derma Clay, for the face and hands. They currently have one called Aloe Clay, which we use in the breast and buttock as a natural donor fat graft filler. That filler is more coarse, so it does not work well on the face.

The Tightening Tools

For skin tightening, the best therapies at the moment are radiofrequency. The use of Morpheus8, which is microneedling with radiofrequency, is one of the most sought-after treatments in our practice. We also use FaceTite in the face, which is a more invasive radiofrequency treatment that treats under the skin and above it, and is usually combined with even liposuction of the neck.

We haven’t seen a lot of new technologies in laser, but the fractionated lasers are still the most used. One has to be careful with skin types, as darker skin types tend to create hyperpigmentation or scarring.

Why I Have Almost Left Thread Lifts Behind

I think thread lifts had a peak in the last two years, but patients have found that they’re really not long-lasting. The threads can behave differently on one side of the face than the other and do create asymmetries. Sometimes these threads are not completely absorbed by the body and can be palpated, or give other problems. We’ve really almost diverged away from thread lifts, and we’ve started to do more minimally invasive surgical procedures instead.

That is the quiet shift in the field worth naming out loud. The threads promised a surgical result without surgery, and they did not deliver it consistently enough to keep.

Set the Expectations Honestly

All these treatments are good in the early stages of aging, or weight-loss-related aging, and they usually give subtle improvements. They can correct specific areas like temporal wasting, hollowness underneath the eyes, or nasolabial lines. The longevity depends on the therapy. Regular fillers can last up to a year. Sculptra tends to last longer, as the collagen generated stays around. The new regenerative treatments, like Lipoderma, or in the future Derma Clay, will be longer-lasting, if not permanent. But aging continues once we set the clock back, even in surgical procedures.

The expectations have to be toned down in nonsurgical procedures and well communicated to the patient. This is true especially with skin tightening using radiofrequency. A lot of the tightening is going to depend on the patient’s own response and cannot be foreseen. Every patient reacts differently and gets different tightening results.

The Test That Sends a Patient to Surgery

Here is my rule of thumb. If the patient is consulting with me and they reach up to their face and pull with their fingers upwards, bringing their brows and cheeks and jowls up, or even tightening their neck back, that’s a sign the patient needs a surgical procedure and not a noninvasive one.

The deep plane lift and the endoscopic deep plane lift are great procedures, which create very natural and long-lasting results. We’re seeing patients completely avoid the noninvasive procedures and go straight to the surgical procedures early on. I trained the deep plane facelift the long way, through the Ponytail Academy intermediate course in Pittsburgh and the advanced course in Santa Monica, after a Mayo Clinic fellowship. The patients who skip straight to it are usually the ones who already did the mirror test on themselves.

The Credential Behind the Opinion

Double board-certified by the American Board of Plastic Surgery and the American Board of Surgery, American College of Surgeons Fellow, Mayo Clinic plastic surgery fellowship, Clinical Associate Professor of Plastic Surgery at Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, and Castle Connolly Top Doctor for thirteen consecutive years. I do both the injectables and the surgery, which is exactly why I can tell you when the injectable is the wrong answer.

Ready to Talk?

If you want the honest read on which side of the line your face is on, that is a consultation, not a sales pitch.

For the patient-facing clinical guide and the mirror test in detail, see the companion post on agulloplasticsurgery.com. For the MedSpa-to-surgery continuum, see the version on swplasticsurgery.com.

Call (915) 590-7900, text 1-866-814-0038, or book online at agulloplasticsurgery.com. #StayBeautiful.

@RealDrWorldWide on Instagram, TikTok, and Snapchat, @Agullo on X, or @AgulloPlasticSurgery on Facebook.