The Face That Lost the Weight: What I Told the Daily Mail About Adriana Lima

Side-by-side of Adriana Lima labeled BEFORE (left, fuller midface, 2023) and NOW (right, Madrid Fashion Week 2026, defined cheekbones and jawline). Press photos supplied by Dr. Agullo for commentary; not a patient and not a result. Commentary by Frank Agullo, MD, FACS.

“I think everybody is in agreement that Adriana Lima looks a lot more like she did in her Victoria’s Secret years. We see the high, defined cheekbones, the visible hollow below them, a sharp jawline, and natural lips, not overdone.”

That was my first line to the Daily Mail when Raven Saunt asked me to read Adriana Lima’s Madrid Fashion Week photos. It ran the same evening. Here is everything I sent her, not just the lines that fit.

I have never treated her. Photo read, not a diagnosis.

Then and now

“Around 2023 and 2024, her midface was much fuller and rounder, but she still looked youthful. Her cheeks sat lower and wider, and her lower face was much heavier, but there was no visible jowling.”

Heavy, no jowls. That is weight, not age.

“So really the difference is not that any volume was added, but rather that it has been taken off, and her structures are now showing better.”

Not surgery

“I don’t think this is surgical. It is quite clear that she’s had surgery in the past, but not in this recent transition. A facelift will change the position of the tissues, and what we’re seeing on her is a change in the volume or amount of tissue.”

Position versus volume. A deep plane facelift moves tissue. Weight loss shrinks it.

“What could explain it from a surgical perspective? I think the main difference here is her weight. She’s been pretty open about gaining weight after her pregnancies, and as surgeons we know that 10 or 15 pounds makes a huge difference in the face, whether you gain it or lose it.”

Ten or fifteen pounds. I wrote about the other direction, the face that empties too fast, in face after weight loss. Lima is the face that filled and came back.

The filler

“It may also have been that she used filler back then, in a period when it was common for filler to be overdone, and it may have been dissolved.”

Filler is a tax. The low, wide cheek of 2023 is what it looks like paid a few years too many. Dissolving it is one injection.

What she may have done instead

“GLP-1s cannot be ruled out in this era. Combined with diet and exercise, and high protein intake, these results are achievable.”

“I do think she may have used radiofrequency for skin tightening in this transition. She doesn’t have the temporal wasting we usually see in weight loss, so she may have had some biostimulators or fillers added to the temples. Botox to the masseters can help create that hollow appearance below the cheekbones. If anything a buccal fat pad removal can accentuate it even further.”

Nothing on that list is a facelift.

What people assume What the photos support The tell
Facelift No Volume changed, position did not
Buccal fat removal Possible, not required The hollow appears with weight loss alone
Filler dissolved Plausible The 2023 cheek sat low and wide
Radiofrequency tightening Plausible Skin kept up with the volume loss
Temple biostimulator or filler Plausible No temporal wasting
Masseter Botox Possible Sharper hollow below the cheekbone

The line they printed

“In conclusion, from the photos, it just doesn’t look like a face that has had surgery, but a face that has lost the excessive volume and allowed the deeper structures to show through.”

The structures were always there.

Why they ask me

Mayo Clinic fellowship. Clinical Associate Professor of Plastic Surgery at Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center. Deep plane facelifts every week in El Paso. Castle Connolly Top Doctor thirteen years running.

Ready to talk?

Bring the photos. Same read I gave the Daily Mail, including the option of dissolving what is there and doing nothing else. Call (915) 590-7900, text 1-866-814-0038, or book at agulloplasticsurgery.com. #StayBeautiful

Find me at @RealDrWorldWide on Instagram, TikTok, and Snapchat, @Agullo on X, or @AgulloPlasticSurgery on Facebook.

Companion reads: the surgery-or-not test on Agullo Plastic Surgery, the dissolve-and-tighten side on Southwest Plastic Surgery.

The Pendulum Never Sat Still: A Surgeon’s Read on a Century of American Beauty

Black and white editorial photograph of a vintage vanity mirror layered with contemporary skincare bottles. Commentary on American beauty standards by Dr. Frank Agullo, MD, FACS.

The Daily Mail asked me to help walk readers through a century of American female beauty, from the flat-chested early 1900s through the glamour of the studio era into the surgery-driven look of the last decade. The feature ran on July 4th, which was a fitting date for a story that is essentially about how a country keeps changing its mind about what a woman is supposed to look like.

I supplied the surgical read. I want to expand on it here, because a magazine article can only hold so much.

The Pendulum Is the Story

If there is one line I would put above the whole piece, it is this. The pendulum has never sat still.

The early twentieth century minimized the female body on purpose. Corsets flattened the chest. Dresses hid the hips. Faces were painted pale and small. Then the pendulum swung the other way, into the hourglass silhouette of the studio era, into the exaggerated glamour of the fifties, into the boyish thinness of the sixties, into the athletic body of the eighties, into the heroin-thin nineties, into the curvier ideal of the 2010s that pushed the pendulum farther than any prior era.

Each swing was culture reacting to whatever the previous decade had insisted on. Each swing was also, quietly, a swing in what women were being asked to do with their own bodies to keep up.

What Actually Changed in the 2010s

For most of that century, the tools were external. Clothing, corsets, girdles, makeup, hair, lighting, camera angle. You could dress into an ideal or paint over the gap.

The 2010s did something new. The tools moved from external to internal.

The Brazilian butt lift went from a niche procedure to a household term inside a decade. Jawline-focused work, chin implants, buccal fat removal, deep neck contouring, went from a small subset of male facial cases to the number one thing a twenty-two-year-old man asks me about. Lip filler stopped being a discreet lunchtime add-on and became a first-year-of-college purchase. Rhinoplasty patterns changed with what a phone camera can show a patient about her own profile.

The pendulum did not just swing. The mechanism changed. That is what I told the Daily Mail, and it is the part I want a reader of this post to sit with.

Why That Matters

An external tool comes off at the end of the day. A corset comes off. A shade of lipstick washes off. A pair of hips built into a 1953 pattern-cut skirt is a Saturday night. It is not you.

An operation is you.

I say this not to sound alarmed. I do this work. I do a lot of it. I have watched grown patients cry at a mirror the day their bandages come off because for the first time in a long time the person looking back matches the person inside their head. That is real. That is the case for the field.

I say it because the calculus has changed. When the tool is internal and permanent, the responsibility to slow down, to ask why now, to ask whose photograph the patient has saved, is much higher on the surgeon than it was in 1953.

Every Era Was Also a Reaction

The other thing I keep pointing out is that no era invented itself. Every look was a reaction to the one before it.

The flat, minimized 1920s was a reaction to the corseted Victorian body. The va-va-voom 1950s were a reaction to wartime austerity. The thin sixties were a reaction to the fifties. Athletic eighties reacted to disco thinness. Heroin-chic nineties reacted to bright, hard, aerobicized eighties. The curves of the 2010s were a reaction to the extreme thinness of the nineties and early 2000s. The quieter, natural-face energy of the mid-2020s is, in real time, a reaction to the overfilled 2010s.

Every generation looks in the mirror and reshapes itself against whatever the last generation insisted on. That is not new. What is new is how quickly the mirror talks back, and how many of the tools now involve an operating room.

What I Do About It In My Own Practice

I take three things very seriously in a consult, more than I did ten years ago.

First, I ask what the patient sees on her phone. Not to snoop. Because the reference photo is the most honest single piece of information she will give me. If the reference photo is a different bone structure than the patient in front of me, we have a much longer conversation before anything is scheduled.

Second, I ask whose voice the patient is bringing into the room. A partner’s, a coworker’s, a comment section’s. If the loudest voice in the room is not hers, we slow down.

Third, I am willing to say the word no more often than I used to. Not every request warrants a procedure, and not every patient in front of me is a candidate today. Sometimes the most useful thing I can offer is a recalibration and a follow up in six months.

Those three moves are not about being precious. They are about the fact that surgery is now the tool for what used to be a costume, and the ethics have to change with it.

The Credential Behind the Opinion

I am double board certified by the American Board of Plastic Surgery and the American Board of Surgery, a Fellow of the American College of Surgeons, and completed my plastic surgery fellowship at the Mayo Clinic. I am a Clinical Associate Professor of Plastic Surgery at Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, sit on the Editorial Board for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, and now sit on the Editorial Board for PRS Global Open. Castle Connolly has recognized me as a Top Doctor for thirteen consecutive years.

I have watched the pendulum swing in real time inside my own operating room. I would rather comment on it honestly than pretend the field is standing still.

The Point

American beauty standards were never fixed. They swung, and each swing asked women to remake themselves in a different direction. What changed in the last fifteen years is that the remaking is often permanent. That is not a scandal. It is a responsibility.

Read the curve, not the current moment. #StayBeautiful.

For the patient-facing companion, see the post on agulloplasticsurgery.com. For the local read on how this shows up in our El Paso consult room, see the version on swplasticsurgery.com.

Ready to Talk?

Thinking about a procedure and want to know whether the reason is yours or borrowed? Ask. That question deserves a real conversation, not a quote sheet.

Call (915) 590-7900, text 1-866-814-0038, or book online at agulloplasticsurgery.com.

@RealDrWorldWide on Instagram, TikTok, and Snapchat, @Agullo on X, or @AgulloPlasticSurgery on Facebook.

A Surgeon’s Read on the Katie Miller Before and After: The Lower Face Did the Talking

Black and white editorial comparison of two portraits side by side. Before-and-after read by Dr. Frank Agullo, MD, FACS.

A national outlet asked me for a technical read on Katie Miller’s transformation, and I agreed with my colleague that the lower half of the face was where the change was. Here is the longer, candid version. It is an educational read from photographs, not a diagnosis. I have not treated her, and a photo is not a consultation.

The Before

In her earlier pictures, we can see that Katie has pretty full cheeks and fullness in the lower face, making her face very rounded, giving her a tired appearance. There’s also a lack of definition of the jawline.

The After

I think a combination of things has occurred since then. She does look younger and more refreshed. Her face is more triangulated, and her jawline is more defined.

What Could Explain It

I think she’s had a combination of botulinum toxin around the forehead, the glabella, and crow’s feet. I think she’s had some weight loss, probably aided by GLP-1, but the lower face change is rather significant.

I think this would only be achievable either with liposuction, with the aid of something like FaceTite for skin tightening and Morpheus8, both of which are radiofrequency treatments, and removal of the buccal fat pad. If she truly has had weight loss, she may be keeping the upper cheek fullness with fillers or biostimulators like Sculptra. Or if she actually had the liposuction and buccal fat removal, she may have had some fat injections to the cheek and zygomatic area. I think it would be a little bit too far-fetched to think that she’s had a lower face lift, although it’s not out of the question.

Why “She Had X” Is the Wrong Read

This is what I want colleagues and readers to take from it. From a photograph, the honest read is a hedged read. The lower-face change here could be a real procedure, a real GLP-1 weight loss, or a combination, and telling those apart from press photos is hard. The technical read is fair game. The flat “she had a buccal fat removal” headline is not, because the same look can be produced more than one way.

Why the Lower Face Did the Talking

The lower third integrates almost everything that happens above it. Volume that drops, skin that loosens, and weight that comes off all collect along the jawline and the lower cheek. So when a face moves from rounded and tired to triangulated and defined, the lower third is where I look first, because that is where the story almost always is. That is exactly why my colleague and I both landed on the lower half of the face.

The Credential Behind the Opinion

Double board-certified by the American Board of Plastic Surgery and the American Board of Surgery, American College of Surgeons Fellow, Mayo Clinic plastic surgery fellowship, Clinical Associate Professor of Plastic Surgery at Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, Editorial Board Member at Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, and Castle Connolly Top Doctor for thirteen consecutive years.

Ready to Talk?

If your own before-and-after is what is on your mind, the read on your face is the place to start.

For the patient-facing version of this read, see the companion post on agulloplasticsurgery.com. For the lower-face treatment menu, see the version on swplasticsurgery.com.

Call (915) 590-7900, text 1-866-814-0038, or book online at agulloplasticsurgery.com. #StayBeautiful.

@RealDrWorldWide on Instagram, TikTok, and Snapchat, @Agullo on X, or @AgulloPlasticSurgery on Facebook.

Reading the Ambassador Face: A Candid Surgeon’s Breakdown of Layered Aesthetic Work

Black and white editorial comparison of two portraits side by side. Aesthetic analysis commentary by Dr. Frank Agullo, MD, FACS.

Reading a face from photos is one of the more interesting things I do, and influencers make it easier. So much of their work gets documented, especially when they are a brand ambassador for a med spa and probably get a lot of their care in exchange for the publicity. Let me read one of these faces candidly, the way I would talk it through with a colleague. This is an educational read, not a diagnosis. I have not treated her, and a photo is not a consultation.

What We Can Be Fairly Sure About

We know for a fact that she’s had neurotoxin to the upper face, which includes the forehead, crow’s feet, and glabella, in hopes of making her eyes more open. She’s had Sculptra to the temples to fill in her temporal recession, hollowness, or temporal wasting. She’s also had Renuva to the temples, also for volume. This is a fat graft. It’s a donor fat graft that is processed, and it encourages ingrowth of fat in that area.

She also had hyaluronic acid filler in the lips, which it seems she did not like and then had dissolved, even though I still see some hints of more volume than she previously had. There is some filler still there that wasn’t completely removed. She had a Botox lip flip. She’s also had PDGF for the under eyes, which is platelet-derived growth factor, which encourages collagen ingrowth. She’s had various lasers and radiofrequency, including Tixel, a thermal resurfacing device, Moxi, a resurfacing laser, and Agnes RF, which is very similar to Morpheus8.

The Weight Loss Is Doing a Lot of the Work

Judging by her earlier photos and her photos now, she’s definitely lost too much weight. I’m not sure if she’s been using a GLP-1, but this has caused her to lose a lot of the good fat in the face, which is the reason she had to fix the temporal wasting. You can notice in the current pictures that she has a lot less lower cheek fat and a lot more angulated jawline. This could all be from weight loss.

Now she has a lot more anterior malar volume, so she may have had some Sculptra and Renuva in the upper cheek area. I’m sure she maintains the skin also with broadband light, like BBL. And I think she’s probably had neurotoxin also to the masseters and lower face, which you can see from her slimmer jawline. She probably has good skin quality maintenance with medical-grade topicals, so tretinoin, vitamin C, but this has never been disclosed.

Why the “She Had X” Take Is Usually Wrong

When you read a face like this, the honest answer is never one thing. It stacks many small treatments over years, plus a real weight change, plus maybe one well-chosen surgical step. The internet wants “she had a facelift” or “she had buccal fat removal.” The truth is messier, and from a photograph you can only ever offer a careful, hedged read.

The One Thing That Hints at Surgery

Now, what calls my attention the most, and I’m not sure she’s had any surgical work, and she is rather young, under forty, is that her brow position is significantly different from her earlier days. It’s pulled up and laterally, which actually opens her eyes. Although a certain degree of this can be achieved with botulinum toxin, the degree she’s showing looks more pronounced. She may have had an endoscopic brow lift, the ponytail type, which can help with brow shaping, and it’s very effective and looks very natural.

Other than that, I don’t see any other signs of actual surgical work. You can see that her nose is unchanged. Although she may have had a rhinoplasty in her early life, you can see that it is off the midline and could actually use improvements. It does look unchanged from her previous photos to now.

The Credential Behind the Opinion

Double board-certified by the American Board of Plastic Surgery and the American Board of Surgery, American College of Surgeons Fellow, Mayo Clinic plastic surgery fellowship, Clinical Associate Professor of Plastic Surgery at Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, Editorial Board Member at Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, and Castle Connolly Top Doctor for thirteen consecutive years. The technical read is fair game. The flat “she had X” diagnosis is not.

Ready to Talk?

If there is a look you are chasing, the real question is which of these layers applies to your face, and in what order.

For the patient-facing treatment-by-treatment guide, see the companion post on agulloplasticsurgery.com. For the treatment menu behind this kind of work, see the version on swplasticsurgery.com.

Call (915) 590-7900, text 1-866-814-0038, or book online at agulloplasticsurgery.com. #StayBeautiful.

@RealDrWorldWide on Instagram, TikTok, and Snapchat, @Agullo on X, or @AgulloPlasticSurgery on Facebook.

The Patient Has Changed: What Looksmaxxing Really Wants From My Consult Room

Black and white editorial photo of a young man in a modern aesthetic consultation setting. Commentary by Dr. Frank Agullo, MD, FACS.

This past April, a twenty-year-old viral streamer named Clavicular collapsed at a Miami mall, sparking discussions across the entire industry for weeks. He represents the public face of the looksmaxxing movement, an online community dedicated to maximizing male attractiveness through any means necessary. His fall from grace suddenly shone a harsh light on the trend my practice has watched approaching.

MedEsthetics contacted me to feature a piece written by Joshua Eferighe about the phenomenon, and my truthful version will now serve as an expansion here.

The statement I keep returning to is this. The patient has changed.

Five Years Ago Versus Now

Five years ago, men visited my clinic with the desire to look less tired. Their only request was simple. Remove the fatigue from their eyes, soften the two frown lines etched between their brows, and prevent them from looking exhausted in photos.

Today they present themselves to my clinic with specific requests about their canthal tilt, their gonial angle, and the eye shape they refer to as the “hunter eye.” They have internalized the lingo, have their ideal reference photos saved on their phones, are typically in their early twenties, and have spent hours on looksmaxxing forums before ever making contact with my staff.

This marks a dramatic shift from the initial consultation framework that guided plastic surgery from its inception.

What the Requests Look Like

One intriguing aspect is that looksmaxxing requests tend to occur in clusters rather than in isolation. When a young man enters my office with such a clearly defined concept in his mind, his list of desired modifications rarely deviates from that of other patients.

Chin augmentation and jaw implants are common, often coupled with genioplasty to bring the chin forward or downward, buccal fat removal to slim the cheeks, a narrowed rhinoplasty, and a lateral canthoplasty to achieve the aforementioned “hunter eye.” Hair restoration is often part of the package too.

The language used is precise and the references are entirely photo-based. These patients are not reticent about their desires. They can articulate every angle, a level of specificity that is genuinely new to my experience.

Where I Think It Comes From

Aesthetic medicine did not originate the idea of looksmaxxing. I do acknowledge, though, that we played a role in laying the groundwork. We established injectables as a norm in the 1990s, endured the subsequent explosion of filler popularity, and ultimately witnessed how filters and social media turned the results of these procedures into an objective checklist.

Online communities embraced these clinical guidelines, stripped out the medical context, and reframed them as optimization objectives. A canthal tilt is an anatomical feature with specific medical implications. It transforms into something entirely different when it is reinterpreted as a metric to be assessed and compared against other men in a comment section.

The Part That Matters: Reading Motivation

This is where my profession fundamentally changed, and it is not the surgical aspect that was transformed.

I now devote more time to understanding a patient’s motivation than to the requested modification itself. There is a significant distinction between a man seeking to subtly blend his nose into the rest of his face and a man who aspires to become the transformed individual he encountered in a viral before-and-after post. The former is a good candidate. The latter is not, at least not at present.

When the desired outcome continues to evolve because it is tethered to an online ideal, the responsible approach is to slow down the planning process. I prioritize the reversible and less invasive steps first, and I am willing to refuse certain requests. Not every desire warrants a scalpel, and the most beneficial outcome is occasionally a recalibration of expectations rather than an irreversible procedure.

This is not about being overly precious. Body image distress is a real and significant issue, and screening for it is an integral part of responsible patient care today, a concept that was far less prominent a decade ago.

The Credential Behind the Opinion

I hold double board certification from the American Board of Plastic Surgery and the American Board of Surgery, am a Fellow of the American College of Surgeons, and completed a plastic surgery fellowship at the Mayo Clinic. I am currently a Clinical Associate Professor of Plastic Surgery at the Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, serve on the Editorial Board for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, and am now a member of the Editorial Board for PRS Global Open. Castle Connolly has recognized me as a Top Doctor for thirteen consecutive years.

I perform a considerable volume of male aesthetic procedures. I have also increased the rate at which I say no, and I believe that is the critical point of this whole discussion.

Ready to Talk?

If you are a man considering this type of procedure, the crucial question is not which angle you should chase. It is whether the intended change aligns with your facial features and your life, or whether it is simply a pursuit of someone else’s photograph.

For the patient-facing perspective on this, see the companion post on agulloplasticsurgery.com. For the treatment menu behind male aesthetics, see the version on swplasticsurgery.com.

Call (915) 590-7900, text 1-866-814-0038, or book online at agulloplasticsurgery.com. #StayBeautiful.

@RealDrWorldWide on Instagram, TikTok, and Snapchat, @Agullo on X, or @AgulloPlasticSurgery on Facebook.