“I think everybody is in agreement that Adriana Lima looks a lot more like she did in her Victoria’s Secret years. We see the high, defined cheekbones, the visible hollow below them, a sharp jawline, and natural lips, not overdone.”
That was my first line to the Daily Mail when Raven Saunt asked me to read Adriana Lima’s Madrid Fashion Week photos. It ran the same evening. Here is everything I sent her, not just the lines that fit.
I have never treated her. Photo read, not a diagnosis.
Then and now
“Around 2023 and 2024, her midface was much fuller and rounder, but she still looked youthful. Her cheeks sat lower and wider, and her lower face was much heavier, but there was no visible jowling.”
Heavy, no jowls. That is weight, not age.
“So really the difference is not that any volume was added, but rather that it has been taken off, and her structures are now showing better.”
Not surgery
“I don’t think this is surgical. It is quite clear that she’s had surgery in the past, but not in this recent transition. A facelift will change the position of the tissues, and what we’re seeing on her is a change in the volume or amount of tissue.”
Position versus volume. A deep plane facelift moves tissue. Weight loss shrinks it.
“What could explain it from a surgical perspective? I think the main difference here is her weight. She’s been pretty open about gaining weight after her pregnancies, and as surgeons we know that 10 or 15 pounds makes a huge difference in the face, whether you gain it or lose it.”
Ten or fifteen pounds. I wrote about the other direction, the face that empties too fast, in face after weight loss. Lima is the face that filled and came back.
The filler
“It may also have been that she used filler back then, in a period when it was common for filler to be overdone, and it may have been dissolved.”
Filler is a tax. The low, wide cheek of 2023 is what it looks like paid a few years too many. Dissolving it is one injection.
What she may have done instead
“GLP-1s cannot be ruled out in this era. Combined with diet and exercise, and high protein intake, these results are achievable.”
“I do think she may have used radiofrequency for skin tightening in this transition. She doesn’t have the temporal wasting we usually see in weight loss, so she may have had some biostimulators or fillers added to the temples. Botox to the masseters can help create that hollow appearance below the cheekbones. If anything a buccal fat pad removal can accentuate it even further.”
Nothing on that list is a facelift.
| What people assume | What the photos support | The tell |
|---|---|---|
| Facelift | No | Volume changed, position did not |
| Buccal fat removal | Possible, not required | The hollow appears with weight loss alone |
| Filler dissolved | Plausible | The 2023 cheek sat low and wide |
| Radiofrequency tightening | Plausible | Skin kept up with the volume loss |
| Temple biostimulator or filler | Plausible | No temporal wasting |
| Masseter Botox | Possible | Sharper hollow below the cheekbone |
The line they printed
“In conclusion, from the photos, it just doesn’t look like a face that has had surgery, but a face that has lost the excessive volume and allowed the deeper structures to show through.”
The structures were always there.
Why they ask me
Mayo Clinic fellowship. Clinical Associate Professor of Plastic Surgery at Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center. Deep plane facelifts every week in El Paso. Castle Connolly Top Doctor thirteen years running.
Ready to talk?
Bring the photos. Same read I gave the Daily Mail, including the option of dissolving what is there and doing nothing else. Call (915) 590-7900, text 1-866-814-0038, or book at agulloplasticsurgery.com. #StayBeautiful
Find me at @RealDrWorldWide on Instagram, TikTok, and Snapchat, @Agullo on X, or @AgulloPlasticSurgery on Facebook.
Companion reads: the surgery-or-not test on Agullo Plastic Surgery, the dissolve-and-tighten side on Southwest Plastic Surgery.
